- Nor does it look as though biological evolution can be explained from within an earthbound theory of life . . . This much can be consolidated by strictly scientific means, by experiment, observation and calculation” (The Intelligent Universe, 1983, p. 242). Like Francis Crick, Professors Hoyle and Wickramasinghe concede the impossibility of the traditional scientific explanation of the origin of life on our planet.
- Unwilling to accept the idea of a life-giving Creator, they also have turned to panspermia as the most acceptable explanation for the origin of life on earth. Of course, the notion of panspermia doesn’t explain how life arose in the first place; it merely removes the question of the ultimate origin of life to some other far-off corner of the universe.
- That such respected and honoured scientists—including a Nobel laureate—embrace such near-unimaginable speculations emphasizes the impossibility of life’s thousands of intricate building blocks emerging through random, undirected processes according to the traditional evolutionary view.
The responsible person for the content of this web site is solely
the webmaster of this website, contactable via this form!